Strategy of Indirect Approach Strategy of the Central Position The Strategy of Indirect Approach was Napoleon's strategy of superiority, and used when he had plenty of manpower and maneuvering room. It was more sophisticated and more dangerous than Strategy of the Central Position.
Napoleon and his Impact Few men have dominated an age so thoroughly as Napoleon Bonaparte dominated his. In many ways he was like Adolph Hitler: Both started wars that led to vast destruction and a new political order.
Both men shaped their times, but both were also products of their times who went with the currents of their respective histories and adeptly diverted those currents to suit their own needs. And ultimately, both were dismal failures. To a large extent, Napoleon's career resulted from the military and political forces he inherited from the Revolution and exploited for his own purposes.
In military affairs, he was lucky to inherit the military innovations of the French Revolution, such as mass conscription which made possible the use of block tactics in order to attack in column and eliminated the need for supply lines, thus making French armies much more mobile.
Therefore, the two characteristics of Napoleonic warfare, massed firepower and mobility were already present when he started his career. However, it was Napoleon's genius that knew how to use them effectively in his first Italian campaign against the Austrians.
Politically, France had suffered a full decade of revolutionary turmoil bymaking the government unstable and corrupt. Church policies were unpopular, especially since they had triggered rampant inflation.
People were sick of this turmoil and longed for a more stable government that would make their lives more secure. Therefore, the interplay of military innovations that made Napoleon a national hero and the longing for a strong, secure government that Napoleon promised led to his seizure of power in Further military victories, once again against the Austrians in Italy allowed Napoleon to consolidate his hold on power and declare himself emperor of France in While we mainly think of Napoleon as a general, he was also a very active administrator, and his internal reforms did a great deal as far as both consolidating some accomplishments of the French Revolution and suppressing others.
One way to assess his government of France is to see how it conformed to the revolutionary motto: As far as political and civil liberties were concerned, Napoleon largely suppressed them with strict censorship and the establishment of a virtual police state in order to protect his power.
However, Napoleon saw equality as a politically useful concept that he could maintain with little threat to his position. After all, everyone, at least all men, were equally under his power. One of his main accomplishments as a ruler was the establishment of the Napoleonic Civil Law Codes, which made all men equal under the law while maintaining their legal power over women.
Therefore, any hopes women may have had of the Revolution improving their legal position were thwarted by Napoleon. Napoleon saw nationalism as indispensable to maintaining the loyalty of the French people to his regime.
After all, it was the spirit of nationalism that had inspired its armies in a remarkable series of victories that had especially benefited Napoleon and allowed his rise to power.
The trick was for Napoleon to build a personality cult around himself so that the French people would identify him with France itself and therefore make loyalty to him equivalent to loyalty to France. However, by identifying national loyalty with one man, Napoleon inadvertently weakened the inspirational force of nationalism and thus his own power.
Overall, Napoleon's internal policies strengthened France and allowed it to dominate most of Europe after a series of successful military campaigns Naturally, he established his style of rule in the countries he overran. However, he mistakenly thought that the administrative and legal reforms of the revolution he carried to the rest of Europe could be separated from the ideas of Nationalism and Liberalism liberty and equality that had given those reforms life and substance.
Therefore, Napoleon's imperial rule inadvertently spread these ideas of Nationalism and Liberalism. This had three effects, all of which combined to overthrow Napoleon. First of all, the empire's non-French subjects picked up the ideas of Nationalism and Liberalism and used them to overthrow, not support, French rule.
Second, subject rulers adopted many of the very military and administrative reforms that had made France so strong.Napoleon Nationalism Essay Nationalism is the devotion of people to the interests of its nation or the love of one’s country to stay independent.
Nationalism played a major role in the downfall of Napoleon in that he wanted an empire and his opponent’s wanted independence.
Keywords: French Revolution, French Nationalism, Napoleon Teaching Standards: See Appendix 1 for teaching standards addressed in this unit. Synopsis: In this unit, students will begin their study of the development of French nationalism as they investigate the causes of the French Revolution.
Nationalism and Napolean Nationalism is the devotion of people to the interests of its nation or the love of one's country to stay independent. Nationalism played a major role in the downfall of Napoleon in that he wanted an empire and his .
The collapse of Napoleon's empire promoted international trade and led to the rise of the European Union The fall of Napoleon and the spread of ideas from the French Revolution led to a history What impact did Napoleon have on popular culture?
The major chance to deliver a blow to British prestige came with the outbreak of the Napoleonic Wars, which largely became a struggle between Britain and France for superiority. Eager to defeat the British, Napoleon explored several bold invasion attempts.
NATIONALISM, ETHNICITY AND DEMOCRACY: CONTEMPORARY MANIFESTATIONS Peri Pamir Introduction. The subject of nationalism is extremely complex, not the least because of the many different sources and manifestations of the phenomenon.